Correcting binocular vision



Sept. 27; 1938.

K. NRQGLE CORRECTING BINOCULAR VISION Filed larch e, 1956 11 Sheets-Sheet 1 Jami/2110 Sept. 27, 1938.

K. N. OGLE CORRECTING B II IOCULAR VIS ION Filed larch 6, 1956 11 shets -shget 2 ug/s:

Sept. 27, 1938. K. N. can: 2,131,232

CORRECTING BINOCULAR VISION I 143-); Di'optem' n M2? Inverataz Ikzzzzetiz'fll $726,

I Atya;

K. N. OGLE 31,232

CORRECTING BINOCULAR VISION I .Filed larch 6, 1936 11 Sheets-She a 8 Sept: 27, 1938.

P g N S Sept. 27, 1938. K. N. OGLE 2,131,232

' CORRECTING BINOCULAR vfsmn 7 Filed larch s, 1936 11 She ets-Sheet 9 1%.. 1V0fowerj'fiappyzyMrzdzbmZZ'kwaZ wn'ectzbiz and V Ji'faZ Adj:

Sept. 27, 1938. N I I 2,131,232

' V CORRECTING BINOCULAR VISION 7 Filed llax ch e, 1936 11 sheets-sheet 11 1 0/0/0440" 1 /9/00 0 040? Vii/00V- 0000 0001 0, 3020 3,455 (WWI f 0, 5; 000 020 000 0.70 .57 0.00 0.20 0,00 0.00

000 0-170 000 0,20 I 2:200 I v 0.20

0.00 10 050004 0.00 0.00 I I. In 07.0

Patented Sept. 27, 1938 UNlTED STATES PATENT OFFlCE;

Truste es of Dartmouth College, Hanover,

N. IL, a corporation of New Hampshire Application March 6, 1936, Serial No. 67,557

' 22 Claims.

According to a recent contribution to the science of physiological optics, the eyes are subject not only to dioptric or muscular defects (ametropia, phoria) or both, but also to defects due to incongruity of the ocular images, which term describes the impression formed in the higher brain centers through the vision of one eye. It is determined not only by the properties of the dioptric image that is formed on the 0 retina of the eye but also by the modifications imposed upon it by the anatomical properties and physiological processes by which this optical image is carried to the higher brain centers.

It was found that binocular vision,and with it in many cases the general well being,of individuals aiilicted with incongruity of their ocular images is very much impaired, and methods and apparatus for examining such patients are for example described in Letters Patent No. 1,944,871, of January Jr. and Gordon H. Gliddon, and copending applications Serial Nos. 618,200 and 706,523, filed June 20,1932 and January 13, 1934, respectively.

Eyeglasses for correcting such defects (which will herein be referred to for short as size or eikonic defects), either alone or in connection with the conventional dioptric or muscular errors, also called iseikonic spectacles, are described in Letters Patent No. 1,933,578, of November 7, 1933, to Adelbert Ames, Jr.

The present invention has the main object of correcting binocular vision according'to an improved method, and of providing correcting spectacles designed in accordance with that method, especially with a view to the application thereto of various practical problems presented by peculiarities of ocular defects, tests, and desired correction which render diificult the exact duplication of the test correction with the corrective spectacles.

In one more specific aspect, my invention deals with providing spectacles for correcting dioptric and size or eikonic ocular defects which are equivalent to certain test lens. means whereby optical properties of these test lenses insofar as they difier from those of the equivalent spectacle lenses, are considered in the computation of the latter.

Another feature of my invention is the tak- 30, 1934, to Adelbert Ames,

provision of 'simple yet exact computation methods and appliances correlated withc'ertain test and lens making procedures, for providing spectacles of the type referred to.

According to the present invention, it is pos- 5 sible to provide spectacles with so-called fit over" lenses of zero vergence power effecting the entire, or part of the. size correction, and also spectacles incorporating both dioptric and size corrections in lens elements of unitary design.

These and other objects, aspects and features of my invention will be apparent fromthe following detailed explanation illustrating its genus with reference to several concrete embodimentsand examples thereof.

The description refers to drawings in which:

Fig. 1 is a diagrammatic representation of an example of an ocular test providing a trial correction to which spectacles according to my invention are substantially equivalent;

Fig. 2 is a schematic representation of a test for evaluating ocular image size defects;

Figs. 3 and 4 are diagrammatic views illustrating the method of designing spectacles according to the present invention; 2

Figs. 5 to 17, 19, 22, and 24 to 28 are examples of graphical charts and tabulations used for purposes of my invention;

Figs.- 18, 20, 21, and 23 are'schematical representations of fit over lenses according to my invention; and

Figs. 29, 29 and 29 are'a front elevation, and two sections on lines 11-0. and bb of that elevation, respectively, of a spectacle for correcting ocular defects with oblique principal and eikonic meridians. Y

. Test conditions Shortly recapitulating the disclosures of the above-mentioned Patent No. 1,944,811 and co- 40 pending applications Serial Nos. 618,200 and 706,523, and by referring to Fig. 1 schematically illustrating one of the various possible test procedures, the patients eyes are positioned at R and L and fuse in binocular vision a fixation ob- 45 vject or fixation objects F. The dioptric conditions during binocularvision can then be measured, for example with an adjustable focusing object D or D placed in the line of vision of ages is determined for example with the aid of eikonic targets TL and TR. having thereon test objects which are symmetrically distributed with respect to the'fixation means, but whose respeceach eye, whereas the relation of the ocular imtive ocular images can be differentiated for comparison thereof.' The test objects are brought into the field of vision by suitable means, for example reflectors M. If the ocular images are unequal, using for example a fixation object F in the center of unlike test objects TL and TR for the left and right eye, respectively, and assuming that the patient has an ocular image size difierence in the horizontal meridian, the test targets will appear to him as indicated in Fig. 2. where the dots may represent dark points of target TL, and the crosses bright points of target TR.

The dioptric defects are corrected and measured with the aid of dioptric trial lens sets, Fig. 1 indicating at LDS, LDC, RDS, and BBC spherical and cylindrical trial lenses, respectively, for the left and right eyes, respectively, the spherical lenses, indicated by letter S, being next to the eyes, and the cylinder lenses (for correcting astigmatism) indicated by letter C, being in front thereof.

The ocular image size or eikonic defects re maining after correcting the dioptric defects may be due to the above discussed inherent ocular image incongruity and in addition, if the dioptric defects of the eyes differ, to the dioptric correction since the latter, in addition to its verg'ence power effect has also an image magnification effect. These eikonic defects are correctedand measured with eikonic or size measuring trial lenses, preferably continuously adjustable magnifying lens systems according to my copending application Serial No. 713,701, filed March 2, 1934. They are provided for overall as well as meridional magnification and indicated at LEO, LEM and BBQ, REM of Fig. 1, the letters 0 and M indicating overall and "meridional respectively.

In this connection, it should be noted that the meridians of astigmatism, or principal meridians, are, generally speaking, for each eye different from the meridians of meridional size differences or eikonic meridians.

Relation between ocular defects, test corrected and spectacles The optical relations under the above-discussed circumstances, between ocular defects, test lens means and equivalent spectacles, upon which relations my invention is based, will now be explained.

Single lens sustem.-The case will first be discussed where a single lens L (Fig. 3) is placed before an ametropic eye E. It is assumed that the eye should be fully corrected, namely that the dioptrlc image on the retina is sharply formed. Gauss Paraxial Ray Theory (compare for example J. G. Leatham, The Symmetrical Optical System, Cambridge, 1908) shows that in any optical system the conjugate distances u andv of an object O and its image I, respectively, from the first and last surfaces (for example D1 and D2,

respectively, of Fig. 3) of the optical system, are defined by the relation where u and v are reduced distances, that is actual distances divided by the index of refraction of the respective medium, and where A, B, C, D are the In this matrix, D1, D2 Dn are the surface powers,

and c1, 0: 611-1 the reduced separations between the respective surfaces.

If D1, D5, D, and D. are the dioptric powers of the four refractive surfaces of the eye E; oi, W and c; the reduced thicknesses of cornea, anterior chamber and crystalline lens, respectively; m the distance of the object (in this case image I of lens L) from D,; and A, B, C, D the respective Gauss coefficients, the reduced distance 12 of the image i on the'retina, from surface D4 is C u, D 2% (3) The relation between the size of image 1 on the retina and the size of the effective object (here I) is then where me is the magnification of the dioptric system of the eye.

Introducing now the single correcting lens L, with reduced thickness the image distance 0 is Substituting the explicit values of the Gauss coefficients and introducing.

, F1 being the vergence with which the incident rays leave surface D1, image distance 1; is

The vergence power V of lens L for distance it is then 1 if S-1 F10 Similarly, the lens magnification of (6) becomes U m S7 1 where U= u The ratio of the linear sizes in any given meridian, of image 2' on the retina and of object O can now be found by multiplying Equations (4) and (9):

Image i being assumed to be sharp, the following relation exists:

By eliminating us with the aid of (3) and by multiplying with, and dividing through 9, the image-object relation can be transformed into i 1 P 1 U-BG. T6 1-D c c 1--Vh p 1-1316 i -ME where large p, vergence and vertex power become identical.

Since the dloptric trial lens elements and in certain instances also the spectacles consist-of two lens elements, it becomes necessary to consider the conditions for such systems, as follows: Two element lens system-Referring now to Fig. 4, D1, D2, D3, D4 are the four surfaces of the two lens elements L: and La; 01 and or respectively are the reduced thicknesses of the respective lens elements; and w is the air separation. Equations (5) and (6) hold true for this case, if the coefficients A, B C, D are evaluated for four surfaces according to matrix (2) and relations corresponding to Formulas (8) and(9) can be written as follows:

By introducing subscripts f and s for the first and second lens, respectively, the total vergence power Vt of the system shown in Fig. 4 becomes:

where 1 Sf Ur;

If the two element lenssystem is used to correct where the eye in a given meridian, the ratio of the sizes 3. of image- 1' on the retina and of object O can be found,-.-in analogy to relation (10), for the'single element lens system-as I 5- ME Since T is defined by separation 10 of the two lens elements, it may be referred to as separation factor.

It willbe understood that in this case as shown in. Fig. 4. All other'values occurring in this relation have been previously explained.

Relation between aniseikonia and size of image on retina.Since the correction of ocular image incongruities or aniseikonia is necessarily based on the relation of the respective ocular images of binocularly. viewed objects, the relation between the sizes of the dioptric images on the retinas and the corresponding ocular images must be considered, and then the relation betweenthe sizes of the ocular images of the two eyes.

The ocular image is a subjective phenomenon, its absolute size can not be measured nor otherwhere Y l= ol V wise determined. However, it can be written as i'=lci, where i is the size of the ocular image, f the size of the corresponding retinal image, and k a factor of proportionality, which can be supposed to be substantially constant for a pair of eyes under certain conditions of binocular vision. Hence, if the sizes of the ocular images of a certain object are i; and i, and the corresponding images on the retina i1 and i2, the ratio of the ocular image sizes is where a=lc1/kz,the ratio of the relations between the sizes of an image on the retina and its corresponding ocular image. Itwill be evident from the above explanation of the nature. of ocular images and of aniseikonia, that a may be different from unity even if the images on the retina are congruous. For purposes of the present discussion, it'is assumed that a is constant for paraxial rays and for any given position of the eyes.

1'; M1 K E-EQd (14) if the ration of E1 to E: is called d, a function of the dioptric characteristics of the respective eyes.

The ratio R0, herein referred to as eikonic ratio, can be measured as discussed above with reference to Figs. 1 and 2.

It will be evident that the magnitudes of M1 and Ma and hence their ratio will vary depending upon the selection of a pair of reference points from which objects and image differences are measured. Always, however, the ratio of image size to object size, i/O=ME is constant, assuming sharp imagery, that is substantially corrected ametropia.

Hence, it should be kept in mind that, although the ratio Ro' (14) is exact and real, the ratio Ml/M2 of the magnifications of test lenses or corrective spectacle lenses alone has no absolute physical meaning as far as aniseikonia is concerned.

Relation between test and spectacle lenses in the correction of aniseikonia.-When the patient is tested as described with reference to Fig. 1,

the eikonic ratio R0 in any given meridian is appear equal. Relation (IO-leads to I R[ da-1 (15) where R is the ratio of the magnifications of the size test lenses. and R=1/Ro. The subscript e indicates. that magnifications M1 and Ma are effected by test lenses.

Generally speaking, and excepting cases of aphakia, R differs from unity only by a few per cent. Therefore, it was found convenient to express this ratio as R=l+e and to refer to 10042 as per cent eikonic or size difference. For example, if the dimension of one image is assumed to be 1.00, and that of the other 1.02, the eikonic d fference would be 2%.

Equation (14) describes the ocular image size ratio for any kind of lenses used with the eyes, and hence also the condition when spectacles are used.

If the spectacle, lenses are selected to provide for the respective eyes magnifications M1 and M2, the ocular images will be equal if all meridians.

Equations (15) and (16) must be identical, and

, therefore This relation, called iseikonic condition, gives Similarly, the vergence powers of test and spectacle lenses must be equal, namely Equations (17) and (18) state the necessary conditions for the design of the lenses of spectacles equivalent in any specified meridian to the particular test correction.

The equivalent spectacle and cylindrical power lenses will be needed before each eye, the spherical lens being usually placed directly in front of the eye.

It is convenient to have the trial lenses so marked that the total effective vergence power of any test lens combination can be found by merely adding to the power of any sphere the efiective power marked on any cylinder.

As relation (11) shows, the powers of cylinders and spheres can be made additive if the marked power V, of the cylinder is For distant vision, the powers can then be added as follows:

It will be understood that, in accordance with Fig. 4, subscripts 1 indicate cylinder lenses, subscripts s spherical lenses, and subscripts 0 vertex powers. Relation (19) sigmfies that, if additive relation (20) is to be fulfilled, V1 can be a function only of the vertex power V01 of the cylinder. Hence, values S and 02 must remain constant for all spherical lenses, or in other words, the front surface powers and thicknesses must be the same for all spheres.

The additive property expressed by Formula (20) is actually found in several of the trial case sets manufactured and extensively used today. Their cylinder lenses are marked with values V's: and, provided that w is always the same, the powers of spheres and cylinders add up to the total power of the trial system, but exactly correct only for'inflnite object distance.

Clinical examinations are usually made at two visual distances, one of 6 m. which is practically infinite, and one at 40 cm. The same trial lenses are used for correcting ametropia at both distances, the amount of ametropia at near distance being expressed in vertex powers V0; and VM. Actually, the vergence power' at near distance is considerably less, and can be determined for any one single lens by subtracting the values of true vertex power Vo--relation (10) and vergence power V for finite distance-equation (8). This operation gives the relation Y s! u+S.,c V in this relation, the value b is a function only of shape factor, object distance'and lens thiclb ness. Values of b for various front surface powwhere ers and lens thicknesses are given graphically in Figs. 5 and 6.-

J to the test object.

In the case of the above-mentioned standard trial lenses, the front surface powers and thicknesses of the spheres are constant for the entire rected by a factor 1' depending on the power of the cylinder. with sufilcient accuracy, the formule. for V: of relation (11) can be written Fig. 7 gives the values of y for cylinder diopters from -4 to +4, to be used when both cylinders and spheres are used. If cylinders alone are used,

the values of 1' alone, as given in Fig. 8, have to be taken into consideration.

Recapitulating, the effective power V of trial lenses at a given object distance will be V=V,,-'b if only spheres are used,

V= V,,-r if only cylinders are used,

and 1 The specifications for the spectacle lens which has the same vergence as the trial lens set can now be found as follows:

First, a spectacle lens having the same vergence power as the trial case sphere for near vision will be considered.

The vergence powers of test lenses and spectacle lenses are according to (21) U712: u] e k 1 According to relation (18) these vergences must be equal:

cylinders and tex power V0, the thickness and the two surfaces D1 and D2 of any lens, according to the relation V: D1 D2 6 where the allowance factor is 25) Die 1 D10 Therefore,relation (24) can be written as 0 1+ 2+ where Factors e and b5 depend only upon the front surface powers, and the lens thickness, for a given visual distance. be is constant,and hence an allowance table giving y can be prepared. Fig. 9 represents such a chart, giving a for any value of D1 and t. Fig. 9 contains only 9 values for even D1 and t values in order not to make it too voluminous for present purposes. For actual use, such a table contains D1 values in 0.25 diopter steps of D1 and 0.2 or 0.1 mm. steps of t. The object distance in Fig. 9 is 40 cm.

In the cylinder power meridian, the spectacle the power 4) An allowance table can be used to relate the verlens with a power equivalent to power Vt due to both sphere and cylinder,compare (22)-, has

and can therefore be neglected.

In the axis meridian of the cylinder there is likewise a correction which is a constant if, as usual, the faces are plano and all cylinders have the same thickness. It can be easily taken into account, preferably by inclusion in charted values as herein used. 7 v

Although they could be moved to varying positions relatively to the eyes, the ocular surfaces of the test lenses are usually placed, for practical reasons, at a fixed distance therefrom. The ocular surfaces of the spectacle lenses, however, will in general not have the position of the corresponding trial case surfaces. The condition of equivalency of the vergence powers of trial and spectacle lenses refers specifically to identical points before the eyes, namely the positions of the ocular trial lens surfaces. Hence, if the spectacle lenses depart from that position, their powers must be altered if the eyes are to be fully corrected. In

general, the change is small and can be taken care =.V (Ah) 1 and the change in vertex power is approximately For distant vision, this reduces to Thus the new vergence power, for which the equivalent spectacle lens is to be designed becomes V= V[1V(Ah)] (2's) and for distant vision v;=Vo[1-V .(Ah)] (29) According to this relation, in order to maintain the eye fully corrected if a converging lens is moved away (Ah) mm. from the position'forwhich its correct power was obtained, its power must be decreased. For negative lenses, the power must be (negatively) increased. A table, as for example shown in Fig. 10, is useful for applying this correction. The table of Fig. 10 shows selected values for near vision, but it will be understood that a similar table can be designed for distant vision, and for intermediate values. The table is otherwise self-explanatory.

M agm'fication.It will be remembered that for any given meridian, the iseikonic condition (17)must be fulfilled. In this condition,'ratio [M1/Mzls refers to the spectacles, R is the measured eikonic correction ratio, and [Mi/Male refers M=s,,s,,TLP (13A) In this, and the following relations, subscript f of change in h refers to cylinders, and s to spheres, in accordance with Fig. 4.

The iseikonic condition can then be written o )l o| of )l] [(amtl' s..s.,TLP' It will now be evident that the true magnification ratio for the spectacle lenses is not B, and can not be found before the magnification ratio of the dioptric trial lenses is determined from the M relation of each trial case set. Only if the ratio of the magnifications of the dioptric trial case lenses could be made unity would R actually indicate a true aniseikonic condition and have a more exact clinical significance.

As pointed out when discussing the conditionsof vergence equivalency, the distance 11.. from cornea to ocular surface of the trial lens set is generallydifierent from the corresponding distance hs of the spectacle. These distances are related by h==h+Ah.

If the P factor of relation (13) is differentiated with respect to h, remembering that V is also a function of h, the result is for small'increments and hence P,= P+AP=P=[1+V(Ah)l By defining P=1+V(Ah), (31) the P, value becomes P8=P=P' (32) By dividing relation (30) through by [Pi/Pale, and by assuming that, as is commonly the case, the dioptric trial case in use has equal thicknesses t: of all spheres, equal front surface (D3 of Fig. 1) powers of all spheres, and constant separation w between all spheres and cylinders, this relation (30) can be written In the T factor, values 10, So! and Cs are constants if the conventional trial set is used; hence T varies ordinarily only with the vergence power V: of the cylinder lens used. For distant vision tests, V: changes into vertex power V0: which is zero in the axis meridian. Hence, the T frctor is unity in that axis for distant vision. It is always present in the power meridian of the cylinder trial lens and in the axis meridian when the object distance is finite.

The L factor is effective in the power and axis meridians, unless the test is made for infinite distance, when his unity. If cylinder lenses are used before both eyes, L is the same for both eyes and cancels out. It will, therefore, be evident that factor L must always be considered in tests for near vision when only one cylinder is used, which is quite'frequently the case.

Summing up, the cylinder trial lens in front of the trial sphere introduces, for near vision, a spurious magnification SofTL in the power and axis meridians; for distant vision, a spurious magnification 801T is introduced in the power meridian.

In the case of distant vision and assuming the distance from eye to ocular surface is the same for test and spectacle correction, the correct magnification in the principal meridian (there is in '20 the mag'nification of the trial lens for the powers plotted along the horizontal axis.

For near vision, the spurious magnification must be taken into account in both meridians, as

indicated above. The SoiTL values in the principal meridian and the SolT'L in the axis meridian can be charted as shown in Fig. 12, which is otherwise similar to Fig. 11 and needs no further explanation.

It should be noted that factor T for the axis meridian is different from T for the power meridian and depends on the vergence power of the cylinder which is in this instance, because the image and object planes coincide, V'=l/(uo+t1).

Selection of spectacle lenses.It will now be evident that with the formulas for V in (10), 13)

.and (21) to (29), the above-described graphical representations for the vergence relations, and Formulas (33) for the magnification relations, spectacle lenses equivalent to a given trial lens correction can be designed for any visual distance, for distances from the eye to the ocular lens surface different for test lenses and spectacles, and by exactly compensating for errors inherent in the generally used above-described dioptric trial lenses.

The practical application of the above-described principles willnow be described more in detailand'for several more or less exacting actual requirements. 1

Recapitulating, with reference to Fig. 13 which uses the reference letters and numerals of previous figures, the eyes are tested with dioptric and eikonic test lenses, at certain distances from the eyes, the two ocular surfaces of the dioptric trial case being usually at equal distances he from their respective eyes. The true vergence powers [V119 and [Val -relation (l8)--are then determined by compensating for inherent deviations as outlined above'.

The true magnification ratio of the trial correction is then determined by modifying the magnification ratio R. obtained by means of the eikonic trial lenses, with themagnifications of the dioptric trial lenses, by taking into account the spurious magnifications N,'see relation (33).

Having thus determined the his values for the respective eyes, a lens surface and a lens thickness, or if lens combinations are used in the spectacles, surfaces and thicknesses are selected which provide these magnifications, and finally the remaining surfaces are obtained which, with the previously selected characteristics,- provide the given vergence power necessary for dioptric correction.

The present invention utilizes the basic principle of separating the total magnification of a lens in factors, in a manner permitting convenient prescription and manufacture of lenses having a magnification and power reproducing the given test correction of an eye. The total magnification M of the lens to be manufactured is separated into two factors S and P, where S is due to optical characteristics not affecting vergence power, and P to dioptric properties.

By preparing lens blanks with front surfaces of certain powers and with certain maximum thicknesses which values define S, it is possible to preselect lenses or blank series with given nondioptric magnifications S. The ocular side of the lens can then be provided with a surface producing the required vergence power and at the sametime producing a P fulfilling condition M'=S'P'. The functions of'front and ocular surfaces, respectively, may be interchanged and, accordingly, the surfaces of a complete system may be divided into "magnification (defining S) and power (defining power and P fulfilling condition M '=S'P') surfaces, respectively.

Spectacles provided with lenses made in accordance with the above prior method are correct generally speaking, coincide, and since the eyes 45 frequently have principal meridians of different inclination, it will now be evident that the meridians of symmetry of the surfaces providing the magnification and the astigmatic correction, re-

spectively, are, generally speaking, inclined to one another.

In order to correct defects of this type, unitary spectacle lenses (or lens units) may be provided which have one toric surface (or set of aces) determining a prescribed magnification 1m in a certain eikonic meridian, and a second surface (or set of surfaces) determining a dioptric correction Vs in a meridian, derived from a principal meridian, which may, or may not, be inclined to cases overall size correction equivalent to that of the trial lenses, whereas meridional size correction, and sometimes also some'overall sizev correction, is provided with the aid of so-called fit over lenses-having substantially no power and being mounted in front of one spectacle lens proper, or of both.

Various embodiments of eyeglasses of this fit over type are feasible; herein they will be distinguished by the shape of the surfaces of the ocular lens element. This element can either have a spherical front surfaceand a toric ocular surface, or a toric front surface and a spherical ocular surface, or two toric surfaces. In many cases, standard lenses of types heretofore used for dioptric correction can be used in combination with no power fit over lenses supplying eikonic correction and compensation.

Spectacles of this type are especially useful for temporary purposes since they are, generally speaking, cheaper than those with unitary lenses or doublets.

The making of practical spectacles accoring to the above-described methods, will now be explained, beginning with fit over lenses.

Iseikonic spectacles with fit over lenses these magnifications must then be found. Ac-

cording to the invention, this is quickly and accurately accomplished with the aid of charts.

Fig. 14 shows a chart for distant vision directly furnishing, according to relations (34) and (35) below, front surface power D1 and lens thiclineqss t effecting the given magnification For near vision, a similar chart according to Fig. 15 is used which contains (SL-1) values corresponding to relations (36) and (37), below.

In either case, the ocular surfacesDz are then found which, together with the other lens elements, provide the "measured and corrected vergence power Vo. For this purpose, tabulations similar to the allowance chart according to Fig. 9 are used to advantage.

These charts are derived from relation (33),

for chart Fig. '14 simplified as above discussed for dis ant vision where p'is indefinite, and for both charts assuming that the ocular surfaces of trial and spectacle lenses are at the same distance from the eye, and that a customary trial set, as above discussed, is used.

These simplifications furnish the following rellations, which are also the basis of Figs. 11 and For near vision:

Principal meridian (m). Mr] :12 (SMTLMJ J): 1 a b Axis meridian (:c)

- For distant vision:

Principal meridian (m) =R (SOIT)I] 1 )i I 02 I m d I l )2 Axis meridian (:c)

=R, (no correction necessary) (3 7 For far vision, another type of correction can I be used as follows. This method of computation is advantageous because it permits the selection I of toric surfaces which can be ground with conventional stock tools. It consists in first selecting an ocular surface, from which a given magnification So.f01 a given front surface D1 and a thickmess it is determined. A chart is preferably prepared giving the relation between $0, t, and D2 according to the following deduction. For distant vision there is o o 1+ I from which results by separating D1:

if a: is a difference memberto be subtracted from Vo-D2 for obtaining D1. The charts shown in Figs. 16 and 17 represent relations (38). Fig. 16 gives, VoD2 values for selected So and t values, and Fig. 1'7, of the nature of an allowance chart,

provides convenient selection of the a: values to be subtracted from the VOD: data of Fig. 16

in order to obtain D1.

I zero power fit over lenses, dimensioned in a man- 1 These ocular lenses are then combined with front and spherical ocular surfaces providing complete dioptric and overall size correction, the meridional size correction being againtaken care ,of by no power fit over' lenses.

This arrangement permits the use of lens blanks having toric front surfaces, the spherical ocular surfaces being ground according to each individual prescription. This has the advantage that I only spherical surfaces have to be added to the blanks in order to provide a given power, the overall magnification and cylindrical power steps being supplied by the toric front surfaces ground at the factory.

In order to facilitate the selection of eyeglasses of this type. I provide charts or tables of which Fig. 19 is an example, and which form, with the method of correcting visual defects for which they are used, part of the present invention.

The table shown in Fig. 19 lists the abovedescribed ocular lens elements with toric (factory made) front surfaces, and spherical ocular surfaces (added when filling the prescription) in the following novel manner: T

Separate sections are provided for various base curves (D1 use") of the front surfaces, as indicated in Fig. 19 at I, 2, and 3. In this instance,

only two sections for base curves of +3.00, +5.50 diopters are shown. Actually, more sections will be necessary, and I found it convenient to provide for base curves in the steps Plano, 3.00, 5.50, 6.50, 7.50, 9.00, 11.50, and 12.50, which correspond to the lens blanks known in the art as 'Iillyer" series P, Centex M, G, A, B, C, E, and F, respectively. It will, however, be understood that other types of lenses'could be used.

In each section, the cylinder curves (D1 m) of /the toric blank surfaces, and the test cylinder values, which approximately agree, are listed as heads of vertical columns at, 6. The testsphere valua, and the final spectacle lens thicknesses t are listed in vertical columns 1 and 8. For each cylinder value is listed one t value, for example at 9, and for each combination of test sphere and test cylinder are given, at It, three figures, the upper figure being the magnification of the spectacle lens in the spherical meridian, the center figure the magnification of the spectacle lens in the cylinder meridian, and the lower figure the D2 value, that is, the curvature of the ocular spherical surface to be added to the blank.

The table 01 Fig. 19 may, for example, be computed by ray tracing and, in the present instance, is designed not for a constant distance of the ocular lens surface, but for an eyewire distance of 12 mm., for reasons which will be discussed later. In its computation, all differences in optical characteristics caused by the difference of eye to ocular surface distances of test lenses and spectacle lenses, test lens separation, lens thickness, etc., are compensated for as at length discussed hereinbefore.

Hence, all that remains to be done after the examination of the eyes is to select the D: value of a lens providing the required dioptric correction and the overall magnification found to be indicated during the test by means of the test lenses LEO and REO (Fig. 1) this magnificationbeing the first figure at I 0 as above explained, and the D2 value the last figure. The appropriate thickness is taken from columns 8. The meridional size difference composed of the compensation values at H in the middle of space It,

and the values measured with the trial lenses at LEM and REM are then corrected with the aid of no power fit over lenses, as above described.

The compensation values II are related to the astigmatic meridian, whereas the measured meridional size difference is in the eikonic meridian. Generally speaking, these two meridians do not coincide, so that this method of correctlon is correctlyapplicable only if the two meridians donot depart more than about 15, which was found to be the approximate threshold value for correction'oi' both magnifications in the same meridian. However, a very large number of actually occurring cases comes within this category.

In view of the nature of the commonly used trial lenses these tables have been computed for direct use when only negative spherical lenses are-employed in the test, that is, if only plano ocular surfaces are used, which do not introduce a shape factor. For use with different trial sets, thetables could be modified accordingly.

If it is desired to fit spectacles with an eyewire distance different from that upon which the tables are based, the following correction has to be made. A correction factor (power in diopters) (Ah in mm.) (39) cylindrical correction, the change in eyewire distance, d, being reckoned positive for an increase in distance and negative for a decrease in dis:-

ference in trial and spectacle lens optics is not taken care of by fit overs, but by the ocular lenses themselves, which have to be designed for the N values described above-compare (33)-, and also take care of the overall size correction. Only the meridional size correctiondetected during the test is then taken care of by fit over lenses. Generally speaking, an ocular lens of this type is of the double torlc type.

A spectacle of this type is shown in Fig. 21.v

Standard ocular lenses-His further possible to correct the dioptric defects with standard lenses, regardless of their magnification properties. compensation for dioptric magnification as well as the compensation'for difference of test and spectacle lens characteristics is then taken care ,of by no power fit over lenses with overall as well as meridional magnification. The various magnification components are found as above explained, combined, and fit over lenses with corresponding magnification properties selected, preferably with the aid of tabulations listing these properties for various steps of distances of the ocular lenses from the eye, which, as above dis-.

case 2.83 diopters. This example gives lenses with zero vergence power at an object distance of cm.

Fit over Zenses'.The ocular lenses obtained in the above-described manner which correct dioptric and certain size defects have to be combined with proper fit over lenses designed to corgiven above, which formulas take into account.

object distance p and ocular surface distance h. According to these formulas t These two equations contain three unknowns, D1, D2 and t, one of which must be specified.

The measured eikonic corrections and the.

I '9 Arbitrarily selecting the thickness t to be specified for any desired lens, the front and ocular surface powers can be found by solving for D1 and D2, as follows:

n (p h) (n 1) I t(p-h-t) I r'z(ph t) (M1)t(n1) (p Values determined according to this relation are preferably laid down, forconvenient magnification steps, in tables of which Fig. 24 is an example. It will now be understood that such tables can also be prepared for distant vision where M=LDa c and Dz=-S5D1.

If a third condition is imposed upon the functioning of the lens, all three specifications D1. D2 and t are uniquely determined, none being arbitrary. Obviously, not more than three conditions can be imposed. An iseikonic lens can thus be designed to have zero verging Power for a given object distance :1 and for a' given'ocular surface distance it, and having a required angular magnification for all other object distances. The equation stating this condition can be obtained by'diflerentiating equation M=S0LP with respect to p and equating. it to zero. The result is independent of p, and the three. conditions are The D1, D2 "and t values are then uniquely determined for given values of p, can be found from (41) The thickness will "be I nh(M" 1) (p-h) 1 +p( n D1 and D2 are found from (40) h, and M and These fit over lenses being then fastened in front of the lenses for correcting dioptric and overall eikonic defects, at the proper distance from ocular surface to eye, and in the proper eikonic meridian, result in a finished spectacle affording exact correction according to the present invention.

.. The nature of this phase of my invention will become more clearly comprehensible through the explanation of the practical application thereof with reference to one of the practical examples to be given at the end of this description.

In the special case' where the astigmatism is I regular, the astigmatic meridians are in the and 90 axes which are not necessarily, but

usually (for'physiological and other reasons) size between the images of the two eyes in the instrument. From these values power lenses duplicating the dioptric test lenses, and fit over size lenses duplicating the eikonic test correction;

are made and fitted in frames by preserving the ocular lens surface to eye distance.

Constant eyewire distance flt over spectacles.-'

It will be noted that the design, of the lenses described above under the heading Spherical 

